CLEVELAND, Ohio --
Attorneys gave a judge contrasting views this afternoon of the role a city police
officer played in the July 4, 2011, shooting death of a Parma man.
Assistant County Prosecutor Brian McDonough told Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Robert McClelland that Mindek "was more of a referee than a cop" during the fracas.
A Cuyahoga County
grand jury in March had indicted Cleveland police officer David Mindek, 41, for
his role in the fatal shooting of a Daniel Ficker, 27, of Parma.
Mindek was charged
with dereliction of duty -- a second degree misdemeanor -- for failing to help
another officer arrest Ficker before a fight erupted and ended with Patrolman
Matthew Craska shooting Ficker in the chest outside his home.
Assistant County Prosecutor Brian McDonough told Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Judge Robert McClelland that Mindek "was more of a referee than a cop" during the fracas.
But defense
attorney Pat D'Angelo contended that Mindek did intervene, but that he was also
forced to consider a variety of factors in an unusual situation.
The prosecution
was expected to begin presenting evidence in the case during the remainder of
this afternoon.
A jury pool had been convened this morning, but Mindek and his attorney opted instead to have the case heard before
Mindek's attorney had said in April, soon after the officer was indicted in the case, that he was not certain whether his client would be tried before a jury or not.
A jury pool had been convened this morning, but Mindek and his attorney opted instead to have the case heard before
Mindek's attorney had said in April, soon after the officer was indicted in the case, that he was not certain whether his client would be tried before a jury or not.
According to
reports: Daniel Ficker had returned home on July 4, 2011, with his partner
Tiffany Urbach, who is also the mother of his two children, when he was
confronted by Cleveland police officers Matthew Craska and Mindek.
Mindek was off
duty at the time, but had enlisted Craska to investigate jewelry reportedly
missing from Mindek's house.
Ficker, Urbach and
their two children had been at Mindek's house earlier in the day for a party.
Mindek's wife, Kimberly, is Urbach's cousin.
She suspected
Ficker had taken the jewelry and told her husband after he came home following
his shift, according to the lawsuit.
After Ficker,
Urbach and their children left the party, they went to Urbach's parents' home
in Strongsville. The children stayed there while Ficker and Urbach went to a
bar, then returned to their Parma home around midnight.
When they got
home, Craska and Mindek were there, having arrived in Craska's cruiser. They
approached Ficker and forced him face down on the hood of the police car,
according to the lawsuit.
A vicious fight
ensued. At one point, Craska used his Taser on Ficker, but it didn't stop him,
according to records.
Cleveland
Patrolman's Association attorney Pat D'Angelo, who represented Craska and
Mindek in a deadly force investigation, said Ficker was the aggressor and
Craska was
defending himself in a life-or-death situation. He said that during the fight
Ficker went for Craska's gun.
Meanwhile,
Ficker's family shot and killed outside his home by a Cleveland police
officer last year sued Mindek for an undetermined amount of damages.
The suit claims Ficker broke free and tried to enter his house through a side door before he was shot.
The suit claims Ficker broke free and tried to enter his house through a side door before he was shot.
The civil suit was
filed by Urbach and Ficker's mother, Bernadette Rolen. Defendants besides
Cleveland include Craska and Mindek.