on sale now at amazon

on sale now at amazon
paperback or ebook

Hearing officer upholds Goodyear police worker’s firing


Hearing officer upholds Goodyear police worker’s firing

by Jackee Coe on Mar. 29, 2012, under Arizona Republic News

 An independent hearing officer upheld Goodyear’s decision to fire John Rowan, who officials said was insubordinate when he refused to answer multiple questions during an internal investigation.

Rowan, who was the assistant to the police chief and department spokesman, was fired Dec. 22 for insubordination and willful disobedience for failing to answer 28 questions and attempting to walk out of an internal investigation interview Nov. 16, according to a Goodyear internal investigation. Rowan appealed the termination.

Rowan claimed city leaders retaliated against him for multiple testimonies he has given alleging police misconduct in two federal lawsuits against the city, and that the inquiry, which was investigating his actions during the death investigation of 18-year-oldJered Pendleton in April 2008, was the city’s attempt to re-investigate him after previous inquiries.

Harold Merkow is an attorney who works as a hearing officer for numerous state and city agencies and was hired by Goodyear to oversee Rowan’s appeal hearing Feb. 22. He said Rowan was required to answer the questions regardless of the circumstances, that previous testimonies he had given could not be applied to the current investigation and that the city had “the complete right” to investigate Rowan’s conduct during the Pendleton investigation.

In his findings, obtained by The Republic through a public-records request, Merkow said Rowan “did not intend to participate” in the interview.

“He thought that the city had an agenda, which included dismissing him from his position and that the interview was set up to further that agenda,” Merkow wrote. “However, despite (Rowan’s) mistrust and suspicions about the interview, he still had an overarching responsibility to answer the questions posed to him, even if his answers were the fifth iteration of the same subject.”

Rowan told The Republic on Tuesday he answered the questions according to his attorney’s advise.

“They just didn’t like the answers they were getting,” he said. “And questions that, to my knowledge, were never asked, I did answer.”

Merkow said Rowan evidently “made a conscious decision not to cooperate” with the investigation and “to avoid accounting for his own actions and conduct.” He said Rowan’s repeated answers of “I’m going to refer back to my prior testimony” and “I’ve already testified to this” were “impudent and his pious outrage about having to answer (the investigator’s) questions was nothing less than posturing.”

Merkow said the termination was “not excessive and is reasonably related to the seriousness of multiple counts of willful disobedience and insubordination.”

City Manager John Fischbach, who abruptly resigned last week, wrote in a letter dated March 16 to Rowan’s attorney that, based on “a thorough review of the facts” and city policy violations outlined in a pre-termination letter, he was upholding the termination.

The investigation into Pendleton’s 2008 hit-and-run death has led to turmoil within the Police Department. There have been multiple internal and external investigations.

Rowan has been interviewed multiple times in the internal and external investigations, and lawsuits.

Department investigators alleged Rowan failed to advise the police chief and city management of information he had related to the Pendleton death investigation and made false or misleading statements about city employees during interviews and depositions.

Rowan, who is running for Maricopa County sheriff, reasserted his claims of retaliation.

“The only two people that were terminated are the two employees that came forward,” Rowan said Tuesday. “Most city governments reward employees who come forward and report misconduct. Goodyear fires them.”

Assistant Police Chief Bill Cusson, who was interim police chief when Rowan was fired, said Rowan’s termination was “absolutely justified” based on department policies.

Rowan doesn’t regret his choices.

“I’m very proud of the actions that I have taken and the decisions that I’ve made in reference to reporting the misconduct,” Rowan said, “and I would do it again.”